• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Year Range: 
Search Issue | RSS Feeds RSS
Previous Issue Next Issue

Nov 1978

Volume 64, Issue S1, pp. S1-S183

back to top
RSS Feeds
back to top Session OOO. Additional Papers (Poster)
FREE

A comparison of community noise abatement strategies (A)

Arnold G. Konheim and Casey Caccavari

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 64, Issue S1, pp. S183-S183 (1978); (1 page)

Online Publication Date: 11 Aug 2005

Full Text: | Download PDF

Show Abstract
As part of its technical assistance program to state and local governments, EPA has been developing a computer‐optimized noise abatement model. Based upon the results of acoustical and attitudinal surveys performed by a community, the model considers the relative benefits of several countermeasures, e.g., property‐line standards or vehicle noise‐level standards. A community using the model will be able to achieve the most cost‐effective noise abatement strategy. The results of the implementation of the model at two stages of refinement are compared for three communities.
FREE

Spectral shape of flow noise, turbulence, and wall pressure fluctuations (A)

J. P. Clay

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 64, Issue S1, pp. S183-S183 (1978); (1 page)

Online Publication Date: 11 Aug 2005

Full Text: | Download PDF

Show Abstract
An elementary model of how a turbulent boundary layer (BI) generates noise is analyzed. Two similarity hypotheses are given which relate B 1 turbulence to flow noise. (I) Dynamic pressures come from the forces created by the interaction of eddies on the viscous sublayer where velocity components normal to the wall are brought to rest. (II) The forces are proportional to the second power of the eddy velocities and the distribution of separation distance between pressure points on the wall is the same as the distribution of eddy sizes. It is concluded that flow noise, wall pressure fluctuations, and BI turbulence all have the same spectral shape in frequency space: of f−5/3. Data on wall pressure fluctuations generally have a f−11/3 form due to spatial averaging by the pressure sensor. Corrections for pressure sensor averaging are given and experimental data are given to demonstrate the validity of the correction. [Work supported by NAVSEA‐03133.]
Close

close