• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are logged out of this journal. Log In

Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L)

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 131, Issue 2, pp. 1011-1014 (2012); (4 pages)

Erin Cvejic, Jeesun Kim, and Chris Davis

MARCS Auditory Laboratories, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Buy PDF (US$30) | View Cart
This study investigated whether the production of prosodic focus and phrasing contrasts was modified when interlocutors could only hear each other [auditory only (AO)], compared to when they could hear and see each other [face to face (FTF)]. The prosodic characteristics of utterances produced by six talkers were examined using both acoustic and perceptual measures (ratings of the degree of focus or clarity of the statement-question contrast). The acoustic measures showed a range of differences between narrow focus and between phrasing contrasts and some of these differences were greater in the AO setting than the FTF one. The listener’s ratings of focus and phrasing showed a clear difference between the AO and FTF conditions, with perceptual attributes of both narrow focus and echoic question phrasing being rated as clearer in the AO condition. To explain these results it is proposed that talkers compensate for the lack of visual prosodic cues in the AO condition by taking extra care (relative to FTF conditions) to ensure the effective transmission of prosodic cues.

© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Support from the Australian Research Council is acknowledged (Grants No. TS0669874 and No. DP0666857).

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENT 1
    1. METHOD
      1. Participants
      2. Materials and procedures
    2. Results and discussion
  3. EXPERIMENT 2
    1. Method
      1. Participants
      2. Materials and procedure
    2. Results and discussion
      1. Rating scores
      2. Regression analyses between acoustic and perceptual measures
    3. GENERAL DISCUSSION

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 43.71.Sy

    Spoken language processing by humans

  • 43.70.Mn

    Relations between speech production and perception

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 17 May 2011
Accepted 20 Dec 2011
Revised 08 Nov 2011

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0001-4966 (print)  

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

Figures (2)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close

close