• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are logged out of this journal. Log In

Improved precision in measurements of acoustic impedance spectra using resonance-free calibration loads and controlled error distribution

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 121, Issue 3, pp. 1471-1481 (2007); (11 pages)

Paul Dickens, John Smith, and Joe Wolfe

School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Buy PDF (US$30) | View Cart
Resonances and/or singularities during measurement and calibration often limit the precision of acoustic impedance spectra. This paper reviews and compares several established techniques, and describes a technique that incorporates three features that considerably improve precision. The first feature is to minimize problems due to resonances by calibrating the instrument using up to three different acoustic reference impedances that do not themselves exhibit resonances. The second involves using multiple pressure transducers to reduce the effects of measurement singularities. The third involves iteratively tailoring the spectrum of the stimulus signal to control the distribution of errors across the particular measured impedance spectrum. Examples are given of the performance of the technique on simple cylindrical waveguides.

© 2007 Acoustical Society of America

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Technical assistance and advice was provided by John Tann. P.D. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (Industry) jointly funded by the Australian Research Council, the Powerhouse Museum, and Terry McGee (flutemaker).

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. REVIEW OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
  3. THEORY OF ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS
  4. CALIBRATION OF IMPEDANCE HEADS
    1. Review of calibration techniques
    2. General calibration technique using up to three resonant-free loads
    3. Choice of calibration loads
  5. ERRORS
    1. Inadequate spectral resolution
    2. Nonlinear transducer responses
    3. Diameter mismatch at the reference plane
    4. Random noise (acoustical or electrical)
    5. The “singularity factor”
    6. Calculating the error in Z
  6. OPTIMIZATION OF THE OUTPUT SIGNAL
  7. MATERIALS AND METHODS
    1. The impedance spectrometer
    2. Calibration loads
  8. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    1. Effect of optimizing the output signal
    2. Effect of calibration
    3. Conclusions and practical considerations for measurement

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 12 Aug 2006
Accepted 27 Dec 2006
Revised 04 Dec 2006

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0001-4966 (print)  

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (5) Tables (2)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close

close