• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are logged out of this journal. Log In

Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 6, pp. 2908-2919 (2002); (12 pages)

Isao Tokuda1, Tobias Riede2, Jürgen Neubauer2, Michael J. Owren3, and Hanspeter Herzel2

1Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, Muroran, Hokkaido 050-8585, Japan
2Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
3Department of Psychology, 224 Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Buy PDF (US$30) | View Cart
Animal vocalizations range from almost periodic vocal-fold vibration to completely atonal turbulent noise. Between these two extremes, a variety of nonlinear dynamics such as limit cycles, subharmonics, biphonation, and chaotic episodes have been recently observed. These observations imply possible functional roles of nonlinear dynamics in animal acoustic communication. Nonlinear dynamics may also provide insight into the degree to which detailed features of vocalizations are under close neural control, as opposed to more directly reflecting biomechanical properties of the vibrating vocal folds themselves. So far, nonlinear dynamical structures of animal voices have been mainly studied with spectrograms. In this study, the deterministic versus stochastic (DVS) prediction technique was used to quantify the amount of nonlinearity in three animal vocalizations: macaque screams, piglet screams, and dog barks. Results showed that in vocalizations with pronounced harmonic components (adult macaque screams, certain piglet screams, and dog barks), deterministic nonlinear prediction was clearly more powerful than stochastic linear prediction. The difference, termed low-dimensional nonlinearity measure (LNM), indicates the presence of a low-dimensional attractor. In highly irregular signals such as juvenile macaque screams, piglet screams, and some dog barks, the detectable amount of nonlinearity was comparatively small. Analyzing 120 samples of dog barks, it was further shown that the harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) was positively correlated with LNM. It is concluded that nonlinear analysis is primarily useful in animal vocalizations with strong harmonic components (including subharmonics and biphonation) or low-dimensional chaos. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.

© 2002 Acoustical Society of America

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 43.80.Ka

    Sound production by animals: mechanisms, characteristics, populations, biosonar

  • 43.80.Lb

    Sound reception by animals: anatomy, physiology, auditory capacities, processing

  • 43.25.Rq

    Solitons, chaos

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 20 Oct 2001
Accepted 08 Mar 2002
Revised 06 Mar 2002

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0001-4966 (print)  

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.



Close

close