• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Year Range: 
Search Issue | RSS Feeds RSS
Previous Issue Next Issue

Mar 2002

Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1131-1485

back to top
RSS Feeds

Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment

Richard J. Baker and Stuart Rosen

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1330-1339 (2002); (10 pages) | Cited 12 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
Sensorineural hearing loss has frequently been shown to result in a loss of frequency selectivity. Less is known about its effects on the level dependence of selectivity that is so prominent a feature of normal hearing. The aim of the present study is to characterize such changes in nonlinearity as manifested in the auditory filter shapes of listeners with mild/moderate hearing impairment. Notched-noise masked thresholds at 2 kHz were measured over a range of stimulus levels in hearing-impaired listeners with losses of 20–50 dB. Growth-of-masking functions for different notch widths are more parallel for hearing-impaired than for normal-hearing listeners, indicating a more linear filter. Level-dependent filter shapes estimated from the data show relatively little change in shape across level. The loss of nonlinearity is also evident in the input/output functions derived from the fitted filter shapes. Reductions in nonlinearity are clearly evident even in a listener with only 20-dB hearing loss. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Ba Models and theories of auditory processes
43.66.Dc Masking
43.66.Sr Deafness, audiometry, aging effects

Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate

Nicolas Grimault, Sid P. Bacon, and Christophe Micheyl

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1340-1348 (2002); (9 pages) | Cited 14 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
In this study, auditory stream segregation based on differences in the rate of envelope fluctuations—in the absence of spectral and temporal fine structure cues—was tested. The temporal sequences to segregate were composed of fully amplitude-modulated (AM) bursts of broadband noises A and B. All sequences were built by the reiteration of a ABA triplet where A modulation rate was fixed at 100 Hz and B modulation rate was variable. The first experiment was devoted to measuring the threshold difference in AM rate leading subjects to perceive the sequence as two streams as opposed to just one. The results of this first experiment revealed that subjects generally perceived the sequences as a single perceptual stream when the difference in AM rate between the A and B noises was smaller than 0.75 oct, and as two streams when the difference was larger than about 1.00 oct. These streaming thresholds were found to be substantially larger than, and not related to, the subjects’ modulation-rate discrimination thresholds. The results of a second experiment demonstrated that AM-rate-based streaming was adversely affected by decreases in AM depth, but that segregation remained possible as long as the AM of either the A or B noises was above the subject’s AM-detection threshold. The results of a third experiment indicated that AM-rate-based streaming effects were still observed when the modulations applied to the A and B noises were set individually, either at a constant level in dB above AM-detection threshold, or at levels at which they were of the same perceived strength. This finding suggests that AM-rate-based streaming is not necessarily mediated by perceived differences in AM depth. Altogether, the results of this study indicate that sequential sounds can be segregated on the sole basis of differences in the rate of their temporal fluctuations in the absence of other temporal or spectral cues. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Ba Models and theories of auditory processes
43.66.Jh Timbre, timbre in musical acoustics
43.66.Mk Temporal and sequential aspects of hearing; auditory grouping in relation to music

Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration

Jesko L. Verhey and Birger Kollmeier

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1349-1358 (2002); (10 pages) | Cited 6 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
Loudness was measured as a function of signal bandwidth for 10-, 100-, and 1000-ms-long signals. The test and reference signals were bandpass-filtered noise spectrally centered at 2 kHz. The bandwidth of the test signal was varied from 200 to 6400 Hz. The reference signal had a bandwidth of 3200 Hz. The reference levels were 45, 55, and 65 dB SPL. The level to produce equal loudness was measured with an adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. A loudness matching procedure was used, where the tracks for all signal pairs to be compared were interleaved. Mean results for nine normal-hearing subjects showed that the magnitude of spectral loudness summation depends on signal duration. For all reference levels, a 6- to 8-dB larger level difference between equally loud signals with the smallest f = 200 Hz) and largest f = 6400 Hz) bandwidth is found for 10-ms-long signals than for the 1000-ms-long signals. The duration effect slightly decreases with increasing reference loudness. As a consequence, loudness models should include a duration-dependent compression stage. Alternatively, if a fixed loudness ratio between signals of different duration is assumed, this loudness ratio should depend on the signal spectrum. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Cb Loudness, absolute threshold
43.66.Mk Temporal and sequential aspects of hearing; auditory grouping in relation to music
43.66.Ba Models and theories of auditory processes

Informational masking with small set sizes

Virginia M. Richards, Zhongzhou Tang, and Gerald D. Kidd, Jr.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1359-1366 (2002); (8 pages) | Cited 19 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
Informational masking refers to interference in the detectability of a sound, or discrimination of some property of a sound, beyond that which can be attributed to interactions at the auditory periphery. In the current experiments the signal to be detected was a tone added to a 6-tone masker, and informational masking was introduced by randomly choosing the frequencies of the tones that comprise the masker. The primary question was whether small numbers of maskers could replace randomly drawn maskers without sacrificing the underlying detection schemes adopted by observers. Similar to the method used by Wright and Saberi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1765–1775 (1999)], detection thresholds were measured for different masker set sizes, where set size refers to the number of 6-tone maskers from which any one masker was drawn. Set sizes of 3, 6, 12, and 24 were tested as well as conditions in which the maskers were chosen at random. In addition, observers’ memory for maskers was coarsely evaluated. Large differences in thresholds were found across observers and across different masker sets. Even for set sizes of 24, the memory test suggests some recognition of maskers for some observers. Post hoc analysis of the data included an evaluation of the relative contribution of different frequencies using a single linear model. As a base for comparison, a linear model fitted to each condition was also evaluated. Although the data were fitted better using many rather than one linear model, the reduction in quality of fit was modest. This result suggests substantial consistency in decision strategies regardless of masker set size. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Dc Masking

Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns

Gerald Kidd, Jr., Christine R. Mason, and Tanya L. Arbogast

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1367-1376 (2002); (10 pages) | Cited 26 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
This study examined whether increasing the similarity between informational maskers and signals would increase the amount of masking obtained in a nonspeech pattern identification task. The signals were contiguous sequences of pure-tone bursts arranged in six narrow-band spectro-temporal patterns. The informational maskers were sequences of multitone bursts played synchronously with the signal tones. The listener’s task was to identify the patterns in a 1-interval 6-alternative forced-choice procedure. Three types of multitone maskers were generated according to different randomization rules. For the least signal-like informational masker, the components in each multitone burst were chosen at random within the frequency range of 200–6500 Hz, excluding a “protected region” around the signal frequencies. For the intermediate masker, the frequency components in the first burst were chosen quasirandomly, but the components in successive bursts were constrained to fall in narrow frequency bands around the frequencies of the components in the initial burst. Within the narrow bands the frequencies were randomized. This masker was considered to be more similar to the signal patterns because it consisted of a set of narrow-band sequences any one of which might be mistaken for a signal pattern. The most signal-like masker was similar to the intermediate masker in that it consisted of a set of synchronously played narrow-band sequences, but the variation in frequency within each sequence was sinusoidal, completing roughly one period in a sequence. This masker consisted of discernible patterns but not patterns that were part of the set of signals. In addition, masking produced by Gaussian noise bursts—thought to produce primarily peripherally based “energetic masking”—was measured and compared to the informational masking results. For the three informational maskers, more masking was produced by the maskers comprised of narrow-band sequences than for the masker in which the frequencies were not constrained to narrow bands. Also, the slopes of the performance-level functions for the three informational maskers were much shallower than for the Gaussian noise masker or for no masker. The findings provided qualified support for the hypothesis that increasing the similarity between signals and maskers, or parts of the maskers, causes greater informational masking. However, it is also possible that the greater masking was a consequence of increasing the number of perceptual “streams” that had to be evaluated by the listener. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Dc Masking
43.66.Mk Temporal and sequential aspects of hearing; auditory grouping in relation to music
43.66.Ba Models and theories of auditory processes

Learning to perceive pitch differences

Laurent Demany and Catherine Semal

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1377-1388 (2002); (12 pages) | Cited 14 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
This paper reports two experiments concerning the stimulus specificity of pitch discrimination learning. In experiment 1, listeners were initially trained, during ten sessions (about 11 000 trials), to discriminate a monaural pure tone of 3000 Hz from ipsilateral pure tones with slightly different frequencies. The resulting perceptual learning (improvement in discrimination thresholds) appeared to be frequency-specific since, in subsequent sessions, new learning was observed when the 3000-Hz standard tone was replaced by a standard tone of 1200 Hz, or 6500 Hz. By contrast, a subsequent presentation of the initial tones to the contralateral ear showed that the initial learning was not, or was only weakly, ear-specific. In experiment 2, training in pitch discrimination was initially provided using complex tones that consisted of harmonics 3–7 of a missing fundamental (near 100 Hz for some listeners, 500 Hz for others). Subsequently, the standard complex was replaced by a standard pure tone with a frequency which could be either equal to the standard complex’s missing fundamental or remote from it. In the former case, the two standard stimuli were matched in pitch. However, this perceptual relationship did not appear to favor the transfer of learning. Therefore, the results indicated that pitch discrimination learning is, at least to some extent, timbre-specific, and cannot be viewed as a reduction of an internal noise which would affect directly the output of a neural device extracting pitch from both pure tones and complex tones including low-rank harmonics. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Fe Discrimination: intensity and frequency
43.66.Hg Pitch

Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination

Jennifer J. Lentz and Marjorie R. Leek

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 111, Issue 3, pp. 1389-1398 (2002); (10 pages) | Cited 11 times

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
The ability to discriminate between sounds with different spectral shapes was evaluated for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Listeners detected a 920-Hz tone added in phase to a single component of a standard consisting of the sum of five tones spaced equally on a logarithmic frequency scale ranging from 200 to 4200 Hz. An overall level randomization of 10 dB was either present or absent. In one subset of conditions, the no-perturbation conditions, the standard stimulus was the sum of equal-amplitude tones. In the perturbation conditions, the amplitudes of the components within a stimulus were randomly altered on every presentation. For both perturbation and no-perturbation conditions, thresholds for the detection of the 920-Hz tone were measured to compare sensitivity to changes in spectral shape between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. To assess whether hearing-impaired listeners relied on different regions of the spectrum to discriminate between sounds, spectral weights were estimated from the perturbed standards by correlating the listener’s responses with the level differences per component across two intervals of a two-alternative forced-choice task. Results showed that hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners had similar sensitivity to changes in spectral shape. On average, across-frequency correlation functions also were similar for both groups of listeners, suggesting that as long as all components are audible and well separated in frequency, hearing-impaired listeners can use information across frequency as well as normal-hearing listeners. Analysis of the individual data revealed, however, that normal-hearing listeners may be better able to adopt optimal weighting schemes. This conclusion is only tentative, as differences in internal noise may need to be considered to interpret the results obtained from weighting studies between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. © 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
Show PACS
43.66.Fe Discrimination: intensity and frequency
43.66.Sr Deafness, audiometry, aging effects
43.66.Ba Models and theories of auditory processes
Close

close